[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gitlab Migration
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Gitlab Migration |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:10:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:52:48AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:53:34 +1000
> > Cc: Daniel Fleischer <danflscr@gmail.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> > Despite what others have claimed, the security problems with email have
> > NOT been addressed. It is still one of the major vectors for
> > compromising access via social engineering [...]
> And other means of communications aren't? Are there _any_ means that
> are immune to these attacks?
Yes, this made me wonder a bit, too, at how diverse perceptions
can be. A code execution platform executing random scripts off
the internet (aka Web browser) beats mail any day, in my view.
Smartphone operating systems with their app "ecosystems" are
fashioned after the same model.
I'd have to see some statistics to support Tim's "major vector"
assertion above.
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Gitlab Migration, (continued)
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Richard Stallman, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/29
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Tim Cross, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Tim Cross, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration,
tomas <=
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Tim Cross, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/28
- RE: [External] : Re: Gitlab Migration, Drew Adams, 2021/08/28
- Re: [External] : Re: Gitlab Migration, Tim Cross, 2021/08/28
- RE: [External] : Re: Gitlab Migration, Drew Adams, 2021/08/28
- Re: [External] : Re: Gitlab Migration, Richard Stallman, 2021/08/29
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/28
Re: Gitlab Migration, john muhl, 2021/08/26