Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs

[Philip Kaludercic]

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> I think this uncleanliness is a bit risky.  Better put the definitions
>>> in their own namespace.  I don't think "transparent compatibility" is
>>> worth the trouble here, and I don't think `s`, `f`, ... solve the
>>> same problem.
>>
>> Can symbol-renaming help here, perhaps?  I believe João is trying to
>> get it ready in time for Emacs 28.
>
> Confirmed.  I am working on the documentation and hope to provide
> "hygienic", drop-in versions of those very `s.el`, `f.el` libraries.  I
> agree with Stefan that those libraries don't seem to be solving the same
> problem of forward-compatibility, though (at least how I've understood
> it, which may very well be "not at all").

Where can I find the code/examples on how this would look like?

> João

-- 
        Philip Kaludercic