|
From: | Phil Sainty |
Subject: | Re: Do shorthands break basic tooling (tags, grep, etc)? (was Re: Shorthands have landed on master) |
Date: | Sat, 02 Oct 2021 12:52:11 +1300 |
User-agent: | Orcon Webmail |
On 2021-10-02 11:38, Richard Stallman wrote:
I think #2 might be a good idea, but #1 would lead to horrible confusion. If the screen does not match the buffer, that is chaos.
No more chaotic than the lisp reader interning symbols using names other than those that are used in the code. All such "things are not as they appear" features are varying degrees of chaos. The feature for #1/#2 would be opt-in, so any user who enabled it would be aware in advance of the nature of the chaos, and therefore not confused by it (it would be the trade-off they were knowingly making in order to read and write short names); and users who did not enable the feature would not encounter any chaos at all, as they would only ever see the real names. -Phil
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |