Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> This patch (hopefully) brings no functional changes, and so should not
> really need any update of any documentation, unless it was in some way
> already lacking before.  The only difference here should be that we can
> now use `kbd' in preloaded code.

Great!

And this reminds me -- perhaps we can add a `byte-optimizer' thingie to
`kbd' to make it expand the argument at compile time (if the parameter
is a literal string)?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no