[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Indentation of def*
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Indentation of def* |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:27:05 -0700 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> The introduction of the `with-*' macros, added three decades ago without
> any such heuristic, shows that these heuristics aren't necessary (or
> useful).
And, again, the correct fix for this is to explicitly say what you want
with an indent declaration. Unlike a heuristic, this will have no false
positives - the user decides.
- Re: Indentation of def*, (continued)
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/18
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/20
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/23
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/27
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/27
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/27
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/30