Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico-posframe

[Philip Kaludercic]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> Indeed, the packages should not be bundled together.  vertico-posframe is
>> an independent component, which pulls in a third-party dependency.
>
> I don't have an opinion on how those should be packaged, but I'll just
> point out that Vertico would not needed to have `posframe` in its
> `Package-Requires` in order to provide support for Posframe.

Yes, this was what I was thinking about. A soft dependency that would
raise an error of the posframe part were actually required, but would
otherwise ignore it.

But as Daniel has said he prefers not to do it this way, we can add
vertico-posframe as a separate package.

-- 
        Philip Kaludercic