Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!

[Andrea Corallo]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 19:22:02 +0000
>> 
>> I think it could be a good idea but I believe there's no need to use
>> macros here, we could have just functions return rvalues no?
>> 
>> I'm not a big fan of C macros and I try not to use them whem possible.
>
> Macros punish unoptimized builds less severely than functions.

Yep, but in this case I'm sure the perf delta is not measurable
therefore IMO functions should be preferred.

  Andrea