[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?
From: |
Yuri Khan |
Subject: |
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad? |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:35:18 +0700 |
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 13:06, Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> wrote:
> Couldn't the same effect be achieved in a simpler manner by copying the
> original file N times in one commit and then stripping the copies and
> original down to what they should eventually become? (AFAIK, git has no
> problem detecting literal copies.)
Indeed, I tried this and it works for me, as long as the first commit
is only literal copies. Maybe Git’s ancestry detection through copies
was not as advanced in the unspecified times when Raymond invented his
technique.
- Re: Splitting image-dired.el into smaller files, (continued)
Renaming files with git not all that bad?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/08
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, Yuri Khan, 2021/12/09
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/09
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, Tassilo Horn, 2021/12/10
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, Yuri Khan, 2021/12/11
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/09
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, tomas, 2021/12/09
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/09
Re: Renaming files with git not all that bad?, tomas, 2021/12/10