Re: `unreadablep'

[Po Lu]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:

> What about just calling with the object and then proceeding as usual
> inside prin1, but using the return value of print-unreadable-function in
> place of the old unreadable value?

It wouldn't allow to differentiate unreadable values printed specially
from readable ones later at read time, but I see no harm in providing
that feature as well.