Re: `unreadablep'

[Qiantan Hong]

>> My memory suggests the plan was to add something like
>> a `print-unreadable-function` that gets called with the offending
>> object.  It could then print it any which way it wants, or signal an
>> error or ...
> 
> Then it seems like most everybody's who's weighed in is in favour of
> that solution
Is it possible to also provide a companion function for read?
Namely, read-unreadable-function, that gets called when
encountering #<.