[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master a1ffee1e82: Add textsec-restriction-level function
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: master a1ffee1e82: Add textsec-restriction-level function |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:27:18 +0100 |
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:24:30 -0500 (EST), Lars Ingebrigtsen
>>>>> <larsi@gnus.org> said:
Lars> branch: master
Lars> commit a1ffee1e82b7152772da86a3adc7513128ffefdf
Lars> Author: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Lars> Commit: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Lars> Add textsec-restriction-level function
Lars> * lisp/international/textsec.el (textsec-restriction-level): New
Lars> function.
Lars> ---
Lars> lisp/international/textsec.el | 52
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lars> test/lisp/international/textsec-tests.el | 12 ++++++++
Lars> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
Lars> diff --git a/lisp/international/textsec.el
b/lisp/international/textsec.el
Lars> index 884425d492..fc809d52c1 100644
Lars> --- a/lisp/international/textsec.el
Lars> +++ b/lisp/international/textsec.el
Lars> @@ -97,6 +97,58 @@ Not that a string may have several different
minimal cover sets."
Lars> (setq set (seq-union set (seq-difference s set))))
Lars> (sort (delq 'common (delq 'inherited set)) #'string<)))
Lars> +(defun textsec-restriction-level (string)
Lars> + "Say what restriction level STRING qualifies for.
Lars> +Levels are (in order of restrictiveness) `ascii-only',
Lars> +`single-script', `highly-restrictive', `moderately-restrictive',
Lars> +`minimally-restrictive' and `unrestricted'."
I assume this is 'decreasing order of restrictiveness'? If so we
should perhaps say so.
Robert
--
- Re: master a1ffee1e82: Add textsec-restriction-level function,
Robert Pluim <=