Re: master 2c79a8f 2/2: Use posix_spawn if possible.

[Saulius Menkevičius]

I’ve just received a new Mac (arm64/M1) for myself so I can test if 28 has it 
broken on macOS too.

—Saulius Menkevičius

> Am 2022-02-02 um 10:30 schrieb Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>:
> 
> 
>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:52:18 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
> 
>>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org>,
>>> p.stephani2@gmail.com,  alan@idiocy.org,  mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp,
>>> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 20:23:23 +0100
>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:30:18 +0200, Saulius Menkevicius 
>>>>>>>> <sauliusmenkevicius@fastmail.com> said:
>>> 
>    Saulius> Thanks Robert!
>    Saulius> I applied your patch and that has actually has fixed the issue. 
> So I
>    Saulius> suggest this patch be applied on master.
>>> 
>>> I can do that, if Eli/Lars agree.
> 
>    Eli> Are there any downsides to the patch?  If not, I see no reasons not to
>    Eli> install that.
> 
> Not as far as I can tell, but I shall test on a few more platforms
> before pushing.
> 
>>> What should we do for emacs-28?
> 
>    Eli> Nothing, because on emacs-28 we use posix_spawn only on macOS.
> 
> Right, Iʼd missed that, master it is then. We could put it in 28.2, I
> guess, but I hadn't noticed any issues with subprocesses on emacs-28
> on macOS.
> 
> Robert
> --