Re: [PATCH] Re: Other details about completion.

[Philip Kaludercic]

Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:

>> May I finally add this patch to master??
>
> I don't know, maybe Philip has no time to review your patch?

Sorry about that (I was struck down with Corona for the last few days,
so I forgot to respond).  Either way, I don't have any objections
(beyond what was discussed in bug#54374 that it might be a good idea to
rethink that mouse-face approach in general -- but if change 2) solves
this then the issue isn't that urgent).

>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:24:25PM +0200, Ergus wrote:
>>>Hi again...
>>>
>>>Here I attached a small patch that makes 3 small changes:
>>>
>>>1) Remove the trailing newline in completions one-column
>>>2) Use another condition in next-completion to jump to minibuffer.
>>>
>>>Normally next-completion with tabs at the end of the buffer needs an
>>>extra tab because it goes to the end of the last completion before
>>>jumping to the minibuffer or wrap.. That extra tab is because the
>>>condition to jump or wrap was eobp/bobp assuming that there is not text
>>>unproppertized after the last candidate.
>>>
>>>3) Remove a comment in switch-to-completions. That comment suggested that
>>>the next-completion action must be called inside
>>>minibuffer-completion-help but IMO that is not totally correct when
>>>completion-auto-select has some of the new values.
>>>
>>>Please, if anyone could review,correct and push I would be very
>>>grateful.

-- 
        Philip Kaludercic