[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master c3ab8f1: Improve buffer-match-p documentation
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: master c3ab8f1: Improve buffer-match-p documentation |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Apr 2022 14:00:28 +0300 |
> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:53:26 +0000
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> +** New function 'buffer-match-p'
> >> +Check if a buffer matches a condition, specified using a DSL.
> >
> > A "DSL"? what's that? We don't have that acronym anywhere else in
> > Emacs, AFAICS. Please make that entry more self-explanatory.
>
> It is supposed to mean "Domain Specific Language". I never noticed that
> it wasn't used anywhere else, so sorry about that. Then again I wasn't
> sure how else to put it. What about
>
> Can be used to check if buffers satisfy a possibly complex
> condition, [giving a few examples]
Just "satisfies some conditions" (with examples) should be fine, IMO.
> > Since buffer-match-p is not documented in the manual, I think this
> > change is for the worse, as it leaves CONDITIONS undocumented. Or am
> > I missing something?
>
> No, I haven't written that yet. This should best be documented in
> lispref/buffers.texi, right?
Probably in "Buffer List", yes.
> >> -(defun display-buffer-assq-regexp (buffer-name alist action)
> >> +(defun display-buffer-assq-regexp (buffer-or-name alist action)
> >> "Retrieve ALIST entry corresponding to BUFFER-NAME.
> >> -This returns the cdr of the alist entry ALIST if either its key
> >> -satisfied a BUFFER-NAME per `buffer-match'. ACTION should have
> >> -the form of the action argument passed to `display-buffer'."
> >> +This returns the cdr of the alist entry ALIST if key and
> >> +buffer-or-name satisfy `buffer-match-p'. ACTION should have the
> >> +form of the action argument passed to `display-buffer'."
> >
> > I fixed some minor issues with the modified doc string, but that still
> > leaves one question unanswered: what does this function return if no
> > alist entry satisfies buffer-match-p? That should be documented.
>
> ... If no entry is found, nil is returned?
That's fine, but please avoid passive tense. Something like
If no matching entry is found in ALIST, return nil.