Does recent great work on separating the bytecode stack make it easier to show bytecode offsets in a traceback?

[Rocky Bernstein]

I recently compiled GNU Emacs master (29.0.50ish) and saw the great work done to separate the bytecode stack. In this thread https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-03/msg00330.html I see a lot of concerns, but no thanks.

So thanks Mattias Engdegård!  

I especially like and appreciate the comment in the C code in bytecode.c showing the Bytecode interpreter stack.

Now that we have a more normal bytecode stack, we have "saved_pc"  shouldn't it be possible to easily show the bytecode offset in lisp/emacs-lisp/backtrack.el ? 

Prior work on this can be found in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-07/msg00711.html

Thanks again.