Re: Adding missing C-x 5 C-j and C-x t C-j commands

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Howard Melman <hmelman@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:17:29 -0400
> 
> Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
> 
> >>> We have the "C-x 5 5" prefix for purposes like this one.
> >>> It's a great fallback,
> >>
> >> It shouldn't be a fallback.  It should be "the new C-x 5" and it should
> >> hopefully completely replace `C-x 5` at some point.
> >
> > Should the prefix `C-x 5` take keys from the `C-x` keymap?
> > So any key in the `C-x` keymap will be automatically
> > available in a key sequence starting with `C-x 5`?
> >
> > For example, `C-x C-d` is bound to `list-directory`,
> > then the inferred `C-x 5 C-d` will show the output
> > of `list-directory` in a new frame?
> 
> I have a question the other way.  I forgot that `C-x 5 .'
> exists and tried `C-x 5 5 M-.' and was surprised to find it
> didn't work (it opened in the same frame as if I just did
> `M-.'.  Is it supposed to work or should I open a bug?

I suggest to file a bug report.  If this is supposed to work the way
it does, someone will explain there why.

Thanks.