Re: Tree-sitter integration on feature/tree-sitter

[Yoav Marco]

Whoops, my mail turned out garbaled, sorry.

Corrected version:

Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Also I think it makes more sense if you just fork it rather than making a 
>>> PR.
>>
>> Yeah, I don't really expect it to be merged.
>>
>> My reason for the PR is for it to be more of a talking point about
>> collaboration between treesit and tree-sitter-langs. I used
>> elisp-tree-sitter before trying the feature/tree-sitter branch, and I
>> really like the richness of its highlighting (which comes from the
>> highlights.scm files).
>
> Do you already have the highlighting working for treesit?

I only checked a few, but yeah, and the syntax highlighting is very pretty.

> If so, maybe you can packages it in a separate package and publish it,
> it would be a nice demonstration of treesit features.

I'm not comfortable with doing that, the query patterns update
frequently upstream (though ubolonton has been busy lately) and all I'm
doing is post-process them a little.

I could try to make a self-updating repo or something with CI -
https://github.com/meain/evil-textobj-tree-sitter for example pulls
highlights.scm changes from nvim's repo weeky.

Is that worth it? I thought people could just as easily use my PR
branch of tree-sitter-langs. That also takes care of fetching grammars.


  Sorry for the late response,
  Yoav