[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking.
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking. |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Aug 2022 14:44:05 +0000 |
Hello, Eli.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 15:54:34 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 10:44:05 +0000
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
> > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> > Hello, Lars.
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 21:03:56 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> > > Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> > > > I don't think it is improbable that a C++ hacker will create a long line
> > > > in a raw string.
> > > If you don't think that's improbable, then you should like the new
> > > optimisations a lot -- ....
> > These "optimisations" break CC Mode.
> They don't "break" it, they cause it occasionally produce inaccurate
> fontifications. And only when otherwise Emacs becomes unusable.
> > > .... because if you, instead of a 10K line in that C++ file, inserted
> > > a 1M line, then Emacs would previously hang indefinitely, but with the
> > > optimisation, it doesn't.
> > Well I tried CC Mode with a 1,000,000 character raw string. It was
> > indeed a bit sluggish but "hang indefinitely" is an exaggeration.
> Try it with a 20MB raw string, then. And, for good measure, in an
> unoptimized build. These are the cases we are trying to make
> workable.
No matter what criterion one deems "workable", there will be some size of
buffer, or line, which renders Emacs "unworkable".
> If all you are saying is that the default value of long-line-threshold
> is too low, we can definitely discuss a better value.
> > Having loaded the file in C++ Mode (without the spiking of
> > narrow-to-region and widen), it took 90 seconds for M-> (first time).
> And you consider that reasonable?
No, I don't. I was just correcting Lars's mistaken assertion that such a
line would make Emacs "hang indefinitely".
[ .... ]
> > Doing these things in the current master branch indeed appeared to be
> > fast, but at one point an error in an after-change-function caused
> > after-change-functions to get set to nil, crashing CC Mode.
> If you can show a recipe for this problem, we will fix it. This code
> is WIP, so some problems definitely remain and should be reported and
> fixed.
I'll see if I can recreate it.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Alan Mackenzie, 2022/08/03
- Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/03
- Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Alan Mackenzie, 2022/08/05
- Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/05
- Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Dmitry Gutov, 2022/08/05
- Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/05
- Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Dmitry Gutov, 2022/08/05
- Re: How the long-lines "optimisation" breaks font locking., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/05