emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: --with-native-compilation build failure on 32-bit systems


From: Andrea Corallo
Subject: Re: --with-native-compilation build failure on 32-bit systems
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 07:44:43 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 10:42 AM Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> wrote:
>
>  Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> writes:
>
>  > Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>  >
>  >> Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca> writes:
>  >>
>  >>> Could 261d6af have broken --with-native-compilation builds on 32-bit
>  >>> systems?  This is what I see building in a clean FreeBSD/i386 13.0
>  >>> jail using 261d6af:
>  >>> 
> http://pkg.ftfl.ca/data/13i386-default/2022-08-04_22h38m28s/logs/errors/emacs-devel-29.0.50.20220804,2.log
>  >>
>  >> I guess these are the error messages?
>  >>
>  >> emacs: Trying to load incoherent dumped eln file
>  >>
>  
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/emacs-devel/work-full/emacs-261d6af/native-lisp/29.0.50-7cc1a43d/preloaded/ediff-hook-0b92f1a2-f843c8a0.eln
>  
>  >>
>  >> I don't know what that means; Andrea added to the CCs.
>  >
>  > It's very surprising to see 261d6af causing this side effect, at least I
>  > don't see why should effect the 32bit build only.
>  >
>  > I'm trying to reproduce it on my 32bit env.
>
>  I confirm the build it's broken on my 32bit env as well, (but not on the
>  64 one).
>
>  Loading the second dump, while we are relocating the ediff-hook
>  compilation unit, we realize (@ pdumper.c:5304) that its file field is
>  not a cons as expected but just a string.
>
>  Now the question is why this is not fixed-up in loadup.el:477 as for the
>  other compilation units?
>
> Are you sure it's actually fixed up in the other compilation units?

Indeed, otherwise an error is signaled.

> This problem should be signaled by loadup if there are any NCUs it does not 
> fix up.  It would be a lot easier to diagnose
> the problem from there.

loadup is in charge of fixing up on all CU's file fields, and indeed if
something goes wrong in that code an error is signaled.  But evidently
this is not the case, so there's something more to understand.

Regards

  Andrea



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]