[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2022 21:01:31 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>> Do we really need those file names to be shorter?
>>
>> Yes, at present the over-long file names are pretty ugly.
>
> FWIW, I appreciate that you can tell what they are, even at a glance.
>
> Compare "haiku-font-support.cc" to something like "cm.c" or "unexcw.c".
Sounds reasonable. I won't shorten the file names then, thanks.
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, (continued)
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Stefan Kangas, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Stefan Kangas, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Visuwesh, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Visuwesh, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/21