Re: master 5a8a5e3d: Input fontification for M-x shell

[miha]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> +(defcustom shell-indirect-setup-hook nil
>> +  "Hook run after setting up an indirect shell fontification buffer."
>
> Thank you for working on these features.  I have a general comment
> about this and other of your changes that were installed recently:
>
> It is not useful to have customizable user options whose doc string
> doesn't explain their purpose.  It makes discovery and use of such
> options much harder.  Imagine a user who upgrades to Emacs 29 and runs
> "M-x customize-changed" to learn about new options in the new version:
> what will such user understand by reading the doc string of this
> option?  There's no explanation what are indirect shell fontification
> buffers, nor how and for what purpose they are used.  Without that, it
> is impossible to understand when and how this hook could be useful.
>
> Could you please augment the doc string with the above in mind?
>
> The same goes for several other hooks in your changes installed today.

Thanks. Will something like this be good? I also tried to address your
other e-mail.

0001-Improve-doc-strings-of-comint-input-fontification-me.patch
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature