Re: master baf1a7a4a0: Turn gv-synthetic-place into a function

[Howard Melman]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> Then I think using just one term is clearer and I agree with
>> Lars about avoiding "place" as much as possible.  I think GV
>> would be a clearer parameter name than PLACE.
>
> Maybe GVAR is a bit less cryptic, then?

GV has the advantages of being shorter and matching gv.el
and should be clear since docstrings should use "generalized
variable" at least once.

But I'd be fine with GVAR instead.

-- 

Howard