Re: Math symbols

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,  schwab@linux-m68k.org,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:37:14 +0200
> 
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 at 09:06, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> >> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:56:49 -0400
> >> 
> >> > Yes, but it's pretty incomplete.  It also has some translations that
> >> > interfere with normal typing, such as ^1 → ¹.
> >> 
> >> Indeed, e.g. I use a tweaked version:
> >
> > Why not add a variant input method to latin-ltx.el, so everyone could
> > enjoy that?
> 
> Everyone can enjoy ELPA packages, right?

Yes.  But then what was your original proposal and questions about?
You said there:

> I was wondering about the next coolest thing, math symbols.  Would
> it make sense to make their TeX names baked into Emacs, next to all
> other information show in `describe-char?

Was this also about adding something to ELPA?  I just assumed that
"baked into Emacs" means to have something in core.