Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: rms@gnu.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 15:33:34 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 05:28:53 -0400
> >> 
> >>   > Sorry, no.  We will not start a dispute about renaming eglot, because
> >>   > that would delay its merge, and we don't have time for that luxury.
> >>   > We want eglot to be part of Emacs 29.
> >> 
> >> We can make this decision in a week.
> >
> > That's not possible, not with these decisions.
> >
> > And even a week's delay is too much.
> 
> I don't know what decisions have been made, but is there a reason why
> delays aren't possible?  Is there some deadline?

The deadline is that we want to have Eglot in Emacs 29, and the
release branch is expected in late November.