Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Manuel Uberti]

On 02/10/22 16:42, João Távora wrote:
> None of this makes any difference to the fact that Eglot is the best
> name for referring to exactly what Eglot is.

FWIW, because I seem to be in the minority here, I really like the name 
Eglot.

To me the name is:

- Clear enough: "glot" makes sense to me, just as the "e" makes me think 
of "emacs" or "elisp" when it's the first letter of an Emacs package 
name (it may not always mean that, of course).

- Short enough: I can quickly type `M-x eglot` and work with whatever 
project I have on my hands.

- Unique enough: I only have to learn what it is about once to refer to 
it or use it without mistakenly thinking of something else.

As long as Eglot comes up when looking for "Emacs LSP" in the manual (or 
on the web), is the name really an issue?

--
Manuel Uberti
https://manueluberti.eu