Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>
> Cc: rms@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 06:57:45 -0400
> 
> To be fair, eglot does a bit more than just being a LSP client.  It
> enables lots of extra fluff.  E.g., it popups up a docstring in the
> mini-buffer using eldoc, it highlights broke code using flymake,
> enables completion using company-mode if that is used, etc -- that is
> quite a bit more than just a simple client interface.

It provides LSP client services to several Emacs features, yes.
Having a client without this glue would be much less useful, because
it would mean we'd need to develop that ourselves.