Re: master 12f63c18f6 1/2: Add new macro 'while-let'

[Philip Kaludercic]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> In that case ought the macro not be called `while-let*'?
>
> Nope.  We're pretending that the * versions of these macros don't exist
> (by not mentioning them in the manual), and we're likewise pretending
> that if-let doesn't have wider semantics than the * version (by not
> mentioning that, either).

On that topic, why do we have `and-let*' and no `and-let'?