[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:29:41 -0700 |
> On Oct 17, 2022, at 12:14 AM, Jostein Kjønigsen
> <jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17.10.2022 06:27, Yuan Fu wrote:
>>
>>> That said, I've noticed something when building the feature/tree-sitter
>>> branch, and also while testing other things tree-sitter related... If a
>>> language-definition SO is missing... treesit.el in Emacs only reports
>>> looking for files and folders typically found within $HOME/.emacs.d/ (that
>>> is user-owned files).
>>>
>>> Based on that, I'm assuming those are the only locations probed. Is that
>>> assumption correct?
>>>
>> It shouldn’t be. Emacs should first look in treesit-extra-load-path, then
>> ~/.emacs.d/tree-sitter, then standard system library locations. The exact
>> locations depend on dlopen. Could you share the error message reported when
>> loading a non-exist language? It should print all the locations it tries (as
>> you observed).
>>
>> Yuan
>>
> textmodes/mhtml-mode.el:29:2: Error: Cannot load language definition:
> "javascript", ("/home/jostein/.emacs.d/tree-sitter/libtree-sitter-javascript:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"
> "/home/jostein/.emacs.d/tree-sitter/libtree-sitter-javascript.so: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory" "libtree-sitter-javascript:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"
> "libtree-sitter-javascript.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> or directory")
Ah, I guess your system doesn’t explicitly say what path has been checked. The
last two messages in the list is where dlopen searches the system paths.
>
> Does that impliy it checks in the standard system library localtion? If so, I
> guess there's no problem.
>
> In that case, sorry for the "noise", but I just wanted to make sure this was
> packagable and thought one check too much is better than one check too little
> :)
Yes, false positives are always better than false negative ;-)
Yuan
- Some issues with the tree-sitter branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/16
- Re: Some issues with the tree-sitter branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/16
- Re: Some issues with the tree-sitter branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/16
- tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Jostein Kjønigsen, 2022/10/16
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Daniel Martín, 2022/10/16
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/17
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Jostein Kjønigsen, 2022/10/17
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions,
Yuan Fu <=
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/17
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Stephen Leake, 2022/10/17
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: tree-sitter: Paths used for loading of language definitions, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/17
Re: Some issues with the tree-sitter branch, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/17