[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:30:19 +0200 |
Hi,
On sam., 15 oct. 2022 at 16:43, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
> That's what I expected. Alas, the natural consequence is that
> building containers implies a risk of including nonfree software. The
> more packages, the more risk.
This is inaccurate.
> As long as that is the case, we should warn people off of distributing
> containers.
Container is not the issue – it is just a format for packing as tar is.
GNU Guix produces container images including only free software and not
relying on Docker binary or infrastructure. Please see this message [1].
1: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-10/msg01078.html>
All the best,
simon
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Philippe Vaucher, 2022/10/03
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Brian Cully, 2022/10/03
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/06
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/07
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/08
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/09
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/15
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/15
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/16
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker,
zimoun <=
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/19
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, zimoun, 2022/10/20
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/22
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/15
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Brian Cully, 2022/10/10
- Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, zimoun, 2022/10/12
Re: [ELPA] new package: tramp-docker, Payas Relekar, 2022/10/16