[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2022 22:31:51 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: matt@rfc20.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:22:22 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii [2022-10-18 18:09:13] wrote:
> > Experience shows that we have no idea where it makes a difference.
>
> Yet we do go through a fair bit of trouble to force such inlining
> in `lisp.h` (under the control of `DEFINE_KEY_OPS_AS_MACROS`).
Yes. I was talking about inline functions in *.c files in the message
to which you replied, not about what we do in *.h files.
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, tomas, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/18