[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2022 15:25:13 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> That is correct, but your change removed only "we", and left "I"
> intact. In any case, rephrasing to avoid pronouns doesn't necessarily
> force us to use passive voice.
Well, if you can, please suggest some better ways to do that. I tried
my best.
- Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Po Lu, 2022/10/27
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/27
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Po Lu, 2022/10/27
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/28
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/28
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Po Lu, 2022/10/28
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Po Lu, 2022/10/28
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/29
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Po Lu, 2022/10/29
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/29
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/29
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Po Lu, 2022/10/29
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/29
- Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code, Stefan Kangas, 2022/10/29