|
From: | Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: | Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages |
Date: | Mon, 31 Oct 2022 07:27:12 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1 |
Thank you very much for your point of view, Helmut!
There may also be technical problems with 3., but the CL communityprobably knows them and the workarounds.
Yes to both.But let me add, as notorious trouble-maker, that shorthands consist of problems only. The fact that no-one seems to want to ask why I think that, I interpret as meaning that this is a well-known fact :-).
But I think 3. will not happen mainly for political/ideological reasons.
Let's see. I hope that ideology doesn't play a role in Emacs, and Richard simply didn't have the necessary information to change his mind.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |