[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs git repo mangled
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs git repo mangled |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:39:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Andreas Schwab [2022-10-31 19:33:13] wrote:
> On Okt 31 2022, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Nothing's wrong: the Git history looks fine to me.
>> The problem is fundamental to `git bisect` (which starts from the
>> assumption that the history is linear, which is a lie).
> That's not true. Bisection handles nonlinear history very well.
I did not say it doesn't handle nonlinear history well. I said it
assumes that the history is linear (it's inherent to the notion of
"bisecting"). Indeed, in practice the way Git turns the non-linear
history into a linear pseudo-history usually works very well.
But there are no miracles.
Stefan
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, (continued)
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/10/31
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Payas Relekar, 2022/10/31
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, João Távora, 2022/10/31
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Michael Albinus, 2022/10/31
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/31
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Andreas Schwab, 2022/10/31
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Andreas Schwab, 2022/10/31
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/10/31