[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 08:25:28 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Then why does it need to be hand-coded here? If it's done all over the
> place, it should have its own `super_extra_safe_call` function or
> something, no?
I don't know, that's just how it is.
> Yet I don't see anything in `ns-in-echo-area` which would call `signal`.
Something may do that, I'm not sure what.
> [ And `safe_call` should be sufficient to protect ourselves from
> `signal`. ]
signal_or_quit calls abort if waiting_for_input.
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Po Lu, 2022/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Kai Ma, 2022/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Po Lu, 2022/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Kai Ma, 2022/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Po Lu, 2022/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Po Lu, 2022/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/05
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Kai Ma, 2022/11/05
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/05
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS,
Po Lu <=
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Kai Ma, 2022/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Po Lu, 2022/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/04