Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!

[Philip Kaludercic]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > >> Before someone asks me to consider assigning my copyright, I would like
>   > >> to say that a printed copy of assignment agreement is in my hands right
>   > >> now, but I can't sign it now, and I don't know when I'll able to sign
>   > >> (don't get me wrong, I really want to sign it).
>   > >
>   > > Do you know when you will know, or are you saying that it isn't worth
>   > > waiting?
>
>   > No, I don't know.  It might be tomorrow (very unlike, but possible), or
>   > even months later.  I think these packages should be published in the
>   > mean time.
>
> Not in GNU ELPA!  An agreement that MIGHT be signed is not valid.

The initial proposal was to add the packages to NonGNU ELPA, I just
mentioned GNU ELPA to double-check.

> It is ok to add them to NonGNU ELPA if they meet the other
> requirements for NonGNU ELPA.

>From what I saw, the requirements are all given.  But I'll try to find
some time tomorrow to check the packages individually.