Re: Eglot, project.el, and python virtual environments

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 20.11.2022 22:35, João Távora wrote:
> You shouldn't be writing performance off as a detail.  You can't just
> wish it away, or think users will change OSs soon.  You should instead
> think of solutions that help manage size and complexity.

No, I'm saying performance itself shouldn't sway the decision in this 
case one way or another. Other means to improve it exist.

> But it's not just performance.  For example, in this particular project,
> it makes sense, by default, to grep the superproject, but C-x f in the
> subprojects.  Lack of subproject support in project.el means I have to
> work around this with defadvice.

Perhaps in your particular project it makes sense. Most of the users I 
see in this thread seem to prefer it otherwise in their projects.

So that seems to indicate that the Eglot fix and the subprojects thing 
should be separate, implemented without tying one to the other.

If you have more things to say about the subprojects feature requests, 
BTW, please go ahead with 'M-x report-emacs-bug'. We'll need a more 
detailed description to decide whether to go ahead with it and how.