[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Standardizing tree-sitter fontification features
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
Re: Standardizing tree-sitter fontification features |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:26:21 +0100 |
5 dec. 2022 kl. 09.58 skrev Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>:
> I agree - but in most tree-sitter languages it seems like there usually
> is no distinction between them. We need to implement some heuristics to
> locate a comment above method etc, if I'm not mistaken.
At least distinguish doc comments by their special syntax, such as `-- !` or
`/**`; it's better than nothing and only requires local analysis. A grammar
tie-in to make sure they aren't misplaced is obviously better (and valuable)
but it can be a later improvement.