[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package "luwak"
From: |
Yuchen Pei |
Subject: |
Re: Package "luwak" |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2022 15:04:09 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri 2022-12-02 18:49:39 -0800, T.V Raman wrote:
> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>
>
> 1+.
>
> As a likely potential user, I looked at that package and didn't see
> anything there that would improve EWW after a quick review;
This package is not intended as a candidate to merge with EWW. It is a
web browser of its own. Stefan Monnier's rationale for merging it with
EWW is that ideally we should have a backend and a frontend systems for
web browsing, the backend retrieves over the net and parses the
response. The frontend decides how to display the parsed results. It is
conceptually a good idea, but requires a lot of work. For starters, lynx
-dump as a backend provides a plaintext version of the html. It seems to
have a long history and widely used for web scraping. There's no dom or
structure, but only links.
Best,
Yuchen
--
Please join me to support free software for a free society:
https://appeal.fsf.org
PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040 4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
<https://ypei.org/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>
- Re: Package "luwak", Richard Stallman, 2022/12/02
- Re: Package "luwak", Will Mengarini, 2022/12/04
- Re: Package "luwak", Jean Louis, 2022/12/04
- Re: Package "luwak", Richard Stallman, 2022/12/05
- Re: Package "luwak", Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/06
- Re: Package "luwak", Richard Stallman, 2022/12/06
- Re: Package "luwak", Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/06
- Re: Package "luwak", Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/07
- Re: Package "luwak", Andreas Schwab, 2022/12/07
Re: Package "luwak", Yuchen Pei, 2022/12/10