Re: Adding the `prescient` packages to NonGNU ELPA?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Why `prescient`, `company-prescient`, `corfu-prescient`,
>> `vertico-prescient` need to be separate packages? Can't they bundle
>> together as a single package? Eglot has additional support for company
>> despite that company isn't a builtin package yet, and eglot doesn't have
>> a `company-eglot` additional package.
>
> This has already been discussed in the thread, and it appears the head
> maintainer is opposed to this approach.  I think it is a pity, as you
> say it usually is not problem to add optional support for a package that
> may or may not be installed (bbdb is another example that does this well).

Is there anything that would prevent us from packaging all the files in
a single tarball?


        Stefan