emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-29 0e39ad6fa5: Fix crash after X error


From: Po Lu
Subject: Re: emacs-29 0e39ad6fa5: Fix crash after X error
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 17:38:44 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> diff --git a/src/xdisp.c b/src/xdisp.c
>> index 06c8b7730c..4e5250486f 100644
>> --- a/src/xdisp.c
>> +++ b/src/xdisp.c
>> @@ -16838,6 +16838,13 @@ redisplay_internal (void)
>>              /* Only GC scrollbars when we redisplay the whole frame.  */
>>              = f->redisplay || !REDISPLAY_SOME_P ();
>>            bool f_redisplay_flag = f->redisplay;
>> +
>> +          /* The X error handler may have deleted that frame
>> +             before we went back to retry_frame.  This must come
>> +             before any accesses to f->terminal.  */
>> +          if (!FRAME_LIVE_P (f))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>>            /* Mark all the scroll bars to be removed; we'll redeem
>>               the ones we want when we redisplay their windows.  */
>>            if (gcscrollbars && FRAME_TERMINAL (f)->condemn_scroll_bars_hook)
>> @@ -16845,7 +16852,6 @@ redisplay_internal (void)
>>  
>>            if (FRAME_VISIBLE_P (f) && !FRAME_OBSCURED_P (f))
>>              {
>> -
>>                /* Don't allow freeing images and faces for this
>>                   frame as long as the frame's update wasn't
>>                   completed.  This prevents crashes when some Lisp
>> @@ -16861,10 +16867,6 @@ redisplay_internal (void)
>>            else if (!REDISPLAY_SOME_P ())
>>              f->redisplay = true;
>>  
>> -          /* The X error handler may have deleted that frame.  */
>> -          if (!FRAME_LIVE_P (f))
>> -            continue;
>> -
>>            /* Any scroll bars which redisplay_windows should have
>>               nuked should now go away.  */
>>            if (gcscrollbars && FRAME_TERMINAL (f)->judge_scroll_bars_hook)
>
> Any reason not to have this test in both places?  I don't want to make
> unsafe changes on the release branch.

Sure, please feel free to make that change.

Thanks.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]