[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Need for "-ts-mode" modes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Need for "-ts-mode" modes |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2022 23:05:24 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > I think we should not enable docker-ts-mode in auto-mode-alist if
(treesit-language-available-p 'dockerfile) is nil.
> I don't see how this could be accomplished, since whether three-sitter
> is available for a language is only known at run time, and
> auto-mode-alist is in files.el, which is preloaded.
It would be possible for `docker-ts-mode' to check whether tree-sitter
is available for the Docker language, and DTRT if not.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Need for "-ts-mode" modes, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/29
- Re: Need for "-ts-mode" modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/29
- Re: Need for "-ts-mode" modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/29
- Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Theodor Thornhill, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Theodor Thornhill, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Theodor Thornhill, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30