[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core pa
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages? |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Mar 2023 14:41:17 -0800 |
What are the implications of turning something into a :core package? I can’t
find much description of it. If my understanding of it is correct, I think it
would be beneficial to make new tree-sitter modes into :core packages. Right
now they are pretty bare-bones, and haven’t been “battle-tested”. Making them
core packages would allow us gradually improve them and fix errors that come
up. Those files I mentioned in the subject are new files, if that matters. But
I don’t know if there are any downsides of turning something into a :core
package.
The new tree-sitter related files we have are:
- c-ts-mode.el
- java-ts-mode.el
- rust-ts-mode.el
- go-ts-mode.el
- dockerfile-ts-mode.el
- cmake-ts-mode.el
- yaml-ts-mode.el
- typescript-ts-mode.el
- ruby-ts-mode.el
- toml-ts-mode.el
And we have a few “combined” files:
- python.el (already a :core package)
- js.el
- sh-script.el
Yuan
- Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?,
Yuan Fu <=
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Holger Schurig, 2023/03/07
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/07
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/03/07