[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA? |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jul 2023 17:51:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi
A year or so ago, I asked/proposed to move MATLAB emacs from MELPA to
ELPA. RMS approved, but the move got a bit stuck since some signatures
of the FSF papers are missing.
I will try to sort it out in the coming weeks but there is one thing I
forgot.
Is it ok if all lisp files are under GLP 2 or later?
The issue GLP 2 or later vs GPL 3 always confuses me, sorry
Regards
Uwe Brauer
--
Warning: Content may be disturbing to some audiences
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against the Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military.
I support the NATO membership of the Ukraine.
I support the EU membership of the Ukraine.
https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/addon/gmail-conversation-view/
- is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Yuchen Pei, 2023/07/08
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/09
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/10
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2023/07/10
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/10
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2023/07/10
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/11
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/12
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/16
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/17