[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Jul 2023 10:04:38 +0000 |
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Am I missing something, does the gap remain intact when the just move
>> point? AFAIU, the gap only needs to move when we do edits.
>>
>> I was thinking about thread-local variables just to move around and read
>> buffer. Asynchronous writing is probably a poor idea anyway - the very
>> idea of a gap does not work well when we need to write in multiple
>> far-away places in buffer.
>
> Thread-local state is NOT cheap! We should not jump at every
> opportunity to add new thread-local state.
I see.
I still think that adding PT, BEGV, and ZV makes sense (even for current
cooperative threads; I have been trying to write something using these
some time ago, and having to constantly switch buffer and set point was
a big annoyance).
As for global C variable bindings, may we get rid of them?
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/07
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/07
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/07
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/07
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/07
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/08
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/08
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/08
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/09
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/09
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/09
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/09
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/09
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/09
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/09
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/10
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/10
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/10
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/10
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/10