[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:18:19 +0000 |
Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com> writes:
> 14 juli 2023 kl. 10.00 skrev Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>:
>
>> It would be nice if the backtraces used `pp' instead of dumb truncation.
>> Though would make things much, much more readable.
>
> Not necessarily as it also means that uninteresting data takes up much more
> space.
> Better have a way to expand and pretty-print individual stack frames on
> demand in the backtrace buffer.
I am a bit confused.
Aren't we talking about terminal output?
>> Of course, the `condition-case' created by ERT will still be an issue.
>
> Yes, and that was probably what really caused Alan's troubles. We could do
> something about that.
I think that this problem was left unresolved due to lack of ideas:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50629
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/13
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/07/17
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/17
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/17