[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should `indirect-function' be preferred over `fboundp'?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Should `indirect-function' be preferred over `fboundp'? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:23:00 +0000 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> The ELisp manual says:
>
> -- Function: fboundp symbol
> This function returns ‘t’ if the symbol has an object in its
> function cell, ‘nil’ otherwise. It does not check that the object
> is a legitimate function.
>
> So this is at least documented.
Yup, but docstring is a lot more deceiving.
fboundp is a function defined in data.c.
Signature
(fboundp SYMBOL)
Documentation
Return t if SYMBOL's function definition is not void.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>