Re: compat.el and Emacs unstable master branch features

[Ihor Radchenko]

Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de> writes:

>>> Yes, if the Emacs maintainers agree I think this could be done. Take
>>> compat.el, remove the part which requires compat-29, and copy it to
>>> lisp/ or lisp/emacs-lisp/. As you said, if Compat (the package) is
>>> installed it will be preferred over the core compat.el. The advantage of
>>> this move is that core package could require compat directly without
>>> passing a noerror argument to require. Furthermore `compat-call' and
>>> `compat-function' would be available and wouldn't have to be copied as
>>> is currently the case for example in erc-compat.el.
>> 
>> That sounds good!  How does this look like:
>
> Yes, this is what I meant. I forgot to mention one additional advantage
> in my last mail: If the compat.el in core is registered with package.el
> as builtin with version 30, the ELPA Compat package wouldn't get pulled
> in by external packages which depend on Compat version 29. The core
> compat.el version should then be bumped together with the Emacs version.

Nobody raised objections. I recommend sending the patch to debbugs (M-x
submit-emacs-patch), so that it can be seen by Emacs maintainers.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>