[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installing cond* in core
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Installing cond* in core |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jan 2024 23:28:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> I have myself expressed significant reservations about installing cond*
> in core. The above could be seen as a politicians response to a
> technical problem, and to some extent it is.
I like the addition of binding constructs to `cond`, so I think `cond*`
could be a worthwhile addition, actually.
But I think the two pattern languages (that of `cond*`s `match*` and
that of Pcase) need to be unified, because they're already too similar
to justify having them both. This would be a very simple change that
simplifies the implementation (and the doc) significantly.
Stefan
- Re: Installing cond* in core, (continued)
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/29
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/29
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/28
Re: Installing cond* in core,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: Installing cond* in core, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/28
Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/29