Defuns in comint

[Daniel Colascione]

How would people feel about defining defuns in comint mode as subprocesses outputs? This way, the same navigation keys people already have become more useful in comint mode without breaking anything, because defun navigation in comint is useless today.

If not defuns, then paragraphs? Sentences? I feel like there should be *some* way of using existing sets of movement and marking commands to talk about outputs, and probably inputs.