[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about `cond*'
From: |
Sean Whitton |
Subject: |
Re: Question about `cond*' |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Oct 2024 13:28:38 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hello,
On Sat 05 Oct 2024 at 11:18pm -04, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > I think we should first consider autoloading cond*, before we
> > talk about preloading it.
>
> You're right, autoloading it would be good enough. How about it?
Sounds good to me too.
--
Sean Whitton
- Re: Question about `cond*', (continued)
- Re: Question about `cond*', Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Michelangelo Rodriguez, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Philip Kaludercic, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Richard Stallman, 2024/10/02
- Re: Question about `cond*', Sean Whitton, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Sean Whitton, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Andrea Corallo, 2024/10/04
- Re: Question about `cond*', Richard Stallman, 2024/10/05
- Re: Question about `cond*',
Sean Whitton <=
- Re: Question about `cond*', Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/06
- Re: Question about `cond*', Stefan Kangas, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/02